
There was a meeting of Blue group at MUVEnation island yesterday to work on Section 3 Activity 1 - creating a virtual travel guide. Boudica (Sally), Tere (Teresa), wico (William) and me were there. Sunshine (Mireille) sent apologies. Bex (Bex) from Orange group joined us to see how we are getting along. Tree posted the whole chatlog for anyone interested in the blow-by-blow details. We started by talking about what we’d learnt, and a couple of very interesting points came up. Well, interesting to me!
- There's lots of information is SL, and lots of opportunity for learning - so much so that there's a danger of lack of focus, distraction, or simply missing the point. So, like good teaching in RL, good teaching in SL requires careful planning and preparation. Teachers in SL need to actively guide learners through SL spaces, maybe more so than in RL where most learners usually will already have an instinctual grasp of the physical, cultural and social topography. Where learners are inexperienced in SL, tutoring is probably a critical element of support.
I’d not thought about this notion on topography before. IRL learners have all the usual reference points; even in a new situation they have an instinctual understanding of most of the rules. In SL, even the laws of physics are different! Learners who are new to SL will need a great deal of support even with simple things like having a conversation. Blue group is working out protocols as it goes along, with some definite patterns emerging; regular affirmative re-statements, frequent summarising, more direct and targeted questions, more invitations to others to speak, active re-incorporation of others ideas, and generally shorter statements. In this meeting, a potentially chaotic five-way conversation went quite well (probably ‘cos we’re all so clever an’ all…)
- SL is a very 'synchronous' space and generates a real sense of 'presence', experienced 1st hand by the group in this sort of collaborative activity. The group also referred to this at various times as 'solidity', 'realism', 'connection', 'virtual attraction', 'community'. While some of the group have experienced a similar sense of presence in other on-line communities everyone agreed this was a particular feature of SL. This makes SL a particularly 'social' environment, and the impact of social interaction is one of the things SL teachers need to plan for.
I’ve never much taken to IM, unlike Boudica who has a very active IM friendship group (Boudica is increasingly referred to as Bo… a sign of growing informality within the group and maybe the push towards shorter statements! I should explain that Bo and I are married IRL… It’s interesting sitting back to back in the study using IM and trying really hard not to cheat!). My problem with IM is rooted in my terrible spelling. I have good coping strategies as an adult, but most involve drafting and re-drafting, something less easy with IM. Blue Group had a bit of a discussion about how SL might allow anxious students more space, and Bex talked about the possibility of re-drafting IM messages. I realised I’m already doing this a little, and will try to do more. IM is synchronous, but maybe doesn’t have to be instant. Slowing down even a little allows for micro-reflection… and even a bit of re-drafting!
- While some SL Education spaces seem vibrant and inhabited, others seem a bit 'run down' and even abandoned. We speculate that some spaces find it hard to sustain the levels of enthusiasm that led to their initial creation. This is another way in which communities are important - in sustaining and inhabiting the spaces created to support them. A number of questions follow on from this; what is the typical lifecycle of an SL community? Is a space that grows out of a community more sustainable than a community that grows out of a space?
I mentioned this is my earlier posts on this activity. The Three Marks of Existence permeate all 10,000 worlds, including the virtual ones. That impermanence should be a feature of SL is no surprise; though the life cycle of some SL space seems remarkably short – communities that seemed to be thriving 18 months ago seem dead on their feet now… As someone about to jump feet first into the land owning business it would be productive to give this careful thought…Bo has just read this over my shoulder and told me that she's heard the Internet called 'the revenge of the introverts'... which led me through Google to an intersting 1995 article in Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine:
Traditionally, humans form relationships with other people because of their geographic proximity. But on the Internet people meet other users because they have similar interests regardless of where they physically live. Howard Rheingold, author of The Virtual Community and a user of San Francisco's WELL system writes, "It's like having the corner bar, complete with old buddies and delightful newcomers and new tools waiting to take home and fresh graffiti and letters, except instead of putting on my coat, shutting down the computer, and walking down to the corner, I just invoke my telecom program and there they are. It's a place." (Livingood, 1995)After the meeting, Bex and I played Frisbee. Not something traditionally associated with IM... just unpacking the necessary kit turned out to be quite complicated, though we got there in the end. Bex turned out to be very good at it, while I was continually picking the frisbee out of the river. Bo just watched while sending IMs, reading e-mail and updating Facebook...
Unable to just have fun, we got to talking about educational applications of frisbee throwing - this would certainly be a good way to practice motor control of avatars!Livingood, J. (1995, April 1). Revenge of the Introverts. Retrieved December 20, 2008, from Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine: http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1995/apr/livingood.html









